Why does the Left hate Trump?
Me... |
As a Leftist with photos of Che' and Hugo Chavez in my wallet, which I kiss regularly, I feel qualified to comment on Fellow Travelers, who sadly are on the same bus but don't want to look at each other and get off at different places. Leftists are the kind of people who take buses because they have to and really want the money to buy a BMW. if they get that money, they become Liberals.
"Leftists", of course, think of themselves as
“progressives” – open-minded, practical, pragmatic, in tune with reality, smart -- which creates a kind of status substituting for fast cars and trophy wives or boy toys.
Yes, they see the danger of global climate
change, imperialism and foreign wars, inequality and animal testing. They are in favor of freedom and democracy. But: "Oh, say can you see...". "Thank you for your service". "Of course, I support Israel".
Most Leftists are pains to be "moderate", which looks "intelligent: and fits media fashions better. Like Justin Trudeau -- and, before him, in his heyday, Tony Blair. Appearance is very important, if only because many are white and upper middle class or want to be. Buy your clothes at the Gap. Spend extra money for jeans with holes in the knees.
Along comes Donald Trump, who does not wear jeans.
Trump is not fashionable -- and he really needs Justin's stylist. (Trudeau not Bieber). He has trophy wives and trophy children and trophy cars -- which, by night, every Leftist or Liberal lusts for in sweaty autoerotic dreams. By day, those dreams are expressed in reverence of closely trimmed beards, turtle necks, leather and the M5 series.
The Liberal Dream |
Bill Maher, the Designated Media Liberal, doesn't like him.
The Yahoos do like him. By "yahoos" we mean Undesignated Ordinary People. And Ann Coulter likes him because she likes whatever the Media hates, as Designated Media Contrarian.
Now, Noam Chomsky who is the Designated Leftist Prophet has weighed in saying that if we judge Trump by what he says, he is dangerous to the nation, the world, in fact to all life on the planet. Noam should know -- he invented Generative Grammar, which nobody but him understands but generations of English Lit students have been forced to study anyway.
Noam says that we have to assume that Trump means what he says. Of course, no politician ever means what he or she says when electioneering.
This is Rule One -- but, hey, this is Chomsky, to whom we on the Left are required to pray to six times a day (to outdo Muslims) -- so he is allowed to revise reality, if not Holy Writ.
That said, Trump (as I have predicted) is already changing his positions, coming out to the Left of the Hillary. His comments are characteristically....
The Inside of Noam's Mind |
Noam says that we have to assume that Trump means what he says. Of course, no politician ever means what he or she says when electioneering.
"I did not have sex with that woman". He meant Hillary. |
That said, Trump (as I have predicted) is already changing his positions, coming out to the Left of the Hillary. His comments are characteristically....
- always open-ended
- only relevant to the context in which they are made
- always contain an element of truth
Political koans. The sound of one hand crapping.
Yes you can clap with one hand. And crap too. |
No. 2 above -- context -- is all-important in politics.
'Nuff said |
To put "context" in context, think of sex (after all, the basis of all human behavior).
"You were wonderful", your partner says after sex. There's an element of truth to that probably. But "wonderful" is open-ended and it doesn't mean she had an orgasm. It's the context that matters.
Human relationships are poliltics |
So there is always a context to what Trump says.
Take his comments about Mexicans and the wall. Yes, American has a problem with illegal immigration. And Mexico has a problem with ...um...illegal emigration. So far, American response has to been to throw a lot of kids in jail while letting others die in the desert.
Take his comments about Mexicans and the wall. Yes, American has a problem with illegal immigration. And Mexico has a problem with ...um...illegal emigration. So far, American response has to been to throw a lot of kids in jail while letting others die in the desert.
But the real issue is NAFTA, which destroyed the Mexican economy forcing poor farmers off the land and into sweat shops (if they were lucky). At the same time, as it also hollowed out American industry. Trump wants to dump NAFTA -- which would go a long way to solving the immigration/ emigration problem. He is also clearly against the kind of international interventionism that resulted in the Honduras coup. And he also opposes TPP.
And repeal NAFTA |
Or:
Trump's famous comments on Islam hating the the US. Now, Trump said he was not talking about the religion, so he really meant the Islamic World. And this is a fact. The Islamic World hates America -- with good reason. Failed states and a few million dead people are a pretty good reason.
Trump's famous comments on Islam hating the the US. Now, Trump said he was not talking about the religion, so he really meant the Islamic World. And this is a fact. The Islamic World hates America -- with good reason. Failed states and a few million dead people are a pretty good reason.
Trump has a solution for that too. Withdraw from the Middle East. Dump NATO. No, he says, Putin is NOT the enemy. Nor are the Chinese. Do deals. Such things go a long way to changing perceptions of the US.
After all, what is a "deal".
It is the opposite of a military fix.,. It is a peaceful solution.
Of course, as I have indicated many times in various blog posts, politicians say all sorts of things when campaigning. The only way to judge them is to look at their record.
In Trump's case, he opposed the Iraq War, spoke in
favor or single payer, and said, hey, he didn’t like abortion but it was a free
country, right, so women get to choose. Compare his record to the Hillary's. Who is the Liberal? Not Hillary. And Trump, at least, he is not a war criminal.
He used to be a Liberal Democrat – but Wall Street has the
lock on the democratic party these days, so he decided to do the unthinkable –
appeal to the People.
The People have no name |
Remember them? The People? Not
just the Middle Class. But the Homeless,
the Poor, temp workers, students too. Everybody.
That great and anonymous mass.
That great and anonymous mass.
Of course, the Founders of the Republic always distrusted
the “People” -- basically anyone whose names they didn't know.
.
.
Which is why the US has a two party system, both parties
representing our modern version of Slave Owners. We all know who they are -- they are few and famous.
Now, Donald Trump has a record as a Liberal Democrat but he
hadn’t married Bill so he was locked out of the race for the Democratic
nomination. He was left with no way of
getting to the Presidency but taking over and redefining the GOP, which , which
over the years has degenerated into a fractured coalition of crazies but now controls congress.
Remember to get something for the kids and school |
You make do with what you got.
The Media, which is owned by corporate cabals are 99%
against Trump. . They characterize him
as a bully and a thug. Another Putin.
Ignoring the fact that Putin – another populist – has been remarkable
successful.
That the One Percent should be 99 percent against Donald
Trump seems commonsense. And should be a recommendation to the Leftwing to support Trump. Yet, the Left is even more anti-Trump than, say, Cruz or the
Koches. Why does Noam hate Trump? Is it simply because a Trump presidency could realize Left-wing
goals?
And then what would he do for a job? Or a lifestyle.
And then what would he do for a job? Or a lifestyle.
Or is it that the Left sold its soul to Neoliberalism years
ago? Blairism was not just a British
thing.
Comments
Post a Comment